Canada’s housing crisis has become a national emergency—home prices remain out of reach for many, rental markets are overheated, and supply is lagging far behind demand.
As the next federal election looms, political conversations increasingly focus on who has the leadership and vision to fix it. Two names stand out for very different reasons: Pierre Poilievre, the current Conservative leader, and Mark Carney, the former Governor of the Bank of Canada (and Bank of England), widely seen as a potential Liberal leadership candidate.
So: If the question is housing—who’s the better Prime Minister? Let’s break it down.
Philosophy: Reduce government interference, unleash the private market.
Housing Plan Highlights:
"Remove gatekeepers": Use federal funding to pressure cities to approve more housing, faster.
Tie infrastructure dollars to building outcomes.
Sell federal land for housing development.
Legalize high-density housing around transit stations and urban cores.
Strengths:
Clear focus on supply-side solutions, especially speeding up approvals and removing zoning restrictions.
Appeals to frustrated younger Canadians priced out of the market.
Wants to treat housing like a productivity issue, not just a social one.
Challenges:
Critics argue his approach may prioritize market-rate development over affordable or social housing.
His aggressive stance on municipalities may create jurisdictional tension.
Limited concrete detail so far on affordable rental or non-profit options.
Philosophy: Market-savvy, but believes in strong institutions and state intervention where needed.
Housing Approach (based on public commentary):
Emphasizes supply and affordability, but with a more holistic lens: economic, social, and environmental.
Has hinted at the need for climate-conscious urban planning, smarter infrastructure, and cooperative governance.
Likely to support public-private partnerships, non-profit housing expansion, and targeted tax policies (e.g., discouraging speculation).
Strengths:
Deep understanding of macroeconomics, interest rates, and financial stability.
Respected globally and could attract serious investment into Canadian infrastructure.
More likely to work collaboratively with provinces and municipalities.
Challenges:
No political track record—unknown how he’d perform in the heat of federal politics.
May be perceived as too technocratic or cautious at a time when bold action is needed.
Could face internal resistance within the Liberal party if he pushes for systemic reforms.
| Factor | Pierre Poilievre | Mark Carney |
|---|---|---|
| Track Record | Strong political presence, clear housing stance | Economic expert, no political leadership history |
| Main Focus | Speed, deregulation, market-based growth | Balance of supply, sustainability, and inclusion |
| Affordability Strategy | Increase supply, reduce red tape | Combine supply with targeted affordability measures |
| Non-Market Housing | Less emphasis | Likely supportive of co-ops, social housing |
| Execution Style | Assertive, combative, direct | Strategic, data-driven, consensus-oriented |
The answer really depends on what you believe is at the root of Canada’s housing crisis:
If you believe the biggest problem is supply bottlenecks and government inefficiency, Poilievre offers a fast-moving, no-frills approach to breaking gridlock.
If you believe the crisis is also about affordability, equity, and long-term planning, Carney may offer a more balanced, systems-level solution—though how he'd implement it remains a question.
What’s clear is this: Canada needs bold leadership, coordination across all levels of government, and innovative solutions to address a crisis decades in the making. Whether that’s delivered by a battle-tested politician or a globally respected economist is a choice voters may soon have to make.
What do you think? Would you trust a bold reformer or a steady strategist with Canada’s housing future? Drop your thoughts in the comments.
”
TORONTO, ONTARIO, March 5, 2025 – Home buyers continued to benefit from substantial choice in the
Greater Toronto Area (GTA) resale market in February 2025. Home sales last month were down in
comparison to the same period last year, while listing inventory remained high, providing substantial
negotiating power for homebuyers.
"Many households in the GTA are eager to purchase a home, but current mortgage rates make it difficult for
the average household income to comfortably cover monthly payments on a typical property. Fortunately, we
anticipate a decline in borrowing costs in the coming months, which should improve affordability," said
TRREB President Elechia Barry-Sproule.
“On top of lingering affordability concerns, home buyers have arguably become less confident in the
economy. Uncertainty about our trade relationship with the United States has likely prompted some
households to take a wait and see attitude towards buying a home. If trade uncertainty is alleviated and
borrowing costs continue to trend lower, we could see much stronger home sales activity in the second half
of this year,” said TRREB Chief Market Analyst Jason Mercer.
GTA REALTORS® reported 4,037 home sales through TRREB’s MLS® System in February 2025 – down by
27.4 per cent compared to February 2024. New listings in the MLS® System amounted to 12,066 – up by 5.4
per cent year-over-year. On a seasonally adjusted basis, February sales were down month-over-month
compared to January 2025.
The MLS® Home Price Index Composite benchmark was down by 1.8 per cent year-over year in February
2025. The average selling price, at $1,084,547, was down by 2.2 per cent compared to the February 2024.
On a month-over-month basis, the MLS® HPI Composite and the average selling price edged lower after
seasonal adjustment.
“With the Ontario provincial election just behind us and the federal political situation in flux, there is a lot to
consider from a policy perspective when it comes to housing. Not only do existing policy makers and those
vying for high public office need to make clear their direction on housing supply and affordability, but they
also need to be clear on how they intend to tackle issues related to trade and the economy. Clear direction
will go a long way to strengthen consumer confidence,” said TRREB Chief Executive Officer John DiMichele.
With the rising cost of goods and services driven by tariffs, many consumers are feeling the financial strain—especially in cities like Toronto, where the cost of living is already high. Tariffs on building materials, household goods, and everyday essentials can increase prices across the board, making it more expensive to own a home, rent an apartment, or even maintain a basic lifestyle.
So, how can consumers safeguard themselves against these rising costs? Here are some practical strategies to help navigate this economic challenge.
With tariffs driving up the price of construction materials, real estate prices and rental costs may continue to rise. Homeowners and renters alike should explore ways to reduce their housing expenses:
As costs for essentials rise, it’s wise to reassess non-essential expenses to maintain financial stability. Consider the following:
An emergency fund can provide financial security in uncertain economic conditions. If tariffs continue to drive up costs, having savings set aside can help you absorb the impact.
If your salary is struggling to keep up with rising costs, consider finding additional income streams:
Understanding how tariffs and economic policies affect your expenses can help you make smarter financial decisions:
Rising living costs due to tariffs can be challenging, but by taking proactive steps, consumers can protect themselves and maintain financial stability. Whether it’s adjusting spending habits, securing stable housing options, or increasing income streams, planning ahead is key to staying ahead of economic pressures.
Are you looking for specific savings tips or budget-friendly solutions in Toronto? Let me know, and I can tailor advice to your needs!